My Jar of Random
doncheftw:

grizz-z:

brownglucose:

iverbz:

MY NIGGA MOVED.

Children have zero sense of fear

He just ran a 4.3 sec 40

NYOOM

doncheftw:

grizz-z:

brownglucose:

iverbz:

MY NIGGA MOVED.

Children have zero sense of fear

He just ran a 4.3 sec 40

NYOOM

bathsabbath:

Have you lovelies pre-ordered Alexandra Crockett’s METAL CATS? It comes out in May and includes over 100 photos of Metalheads and their cats, and features members of Holy Grail, Skeletonwitch, Morbid Angel, Cattle Decapitation, Napalm Death, Municipal Waste, and a ton more.

You can pre-order here, follow them on Etsy for merch, and follow them on Facebook for more info and news on benefit shows. One is coming up on May 10th in Seattle, and May 24th in Oakland.
And the best part, a portion of proceeds go towards no-kill shelters! Go support Alexandra, she’s super sweet and super talented and it’s for an awesome cause! KITTENS!

regalium:

IDK IF YOU KNOW ABOUT THIS WEBSITE YET, BUT I DON’T EVEN CARE IF YOU DO.

CHARAHUB BASICALLY ALLOWS YOU TO MAKE A DIRECTORY OF ALL YOUR OCS.

LIKE SO

image

AND SO (they let you get super detailed)

image

It lets you store 100 characters (you gain 2 extra slots whenever…

In some ways, the term “pansexual” came out of biphobia and a need to stipulate that one was not transphobic. If you take the binary view of “bisexual,” then a sexuality specific to an attraction to men and women could be seen as being noninclusive of transgender men and women. On the other hand, transgender men and women want to (and should) be seen as simply men and women, meaning that they would/should be included in that very binary; not including them tends to be much more phobic and noninclusive.

Then there is the thought that the binary view of bisexuality can be seen as phobic of anyone who identifies as genderqueer, or somewhere along the gender and sexuality spectrum, not identifying as male or female, man or woman. But, as I mentioned before, the true definition of “bisexual” is being attracted to those who are the same as me and those who are different from me, encompassing all genders and identities. The often-repeated argument that “bi means two” ignores a simple fact: “Same” and “different” are, indeed, two groups.

via The Bad ‘B’ Word: A Need for Bisexual Acceptance

(via bellevierge)

Ok, as someone who was bi and became pan, I agree that this… could be a thing? And is certainly one way to look at it. But, just to play devil’s advocate, trans people aren’t the only other group pansexual includes. To me, personally, pansexual means that I am attracted to a person (but don’t need a deep connection to form that bond sexually or romantically, like a demisexual), and that sexual orientation, gender, physical or otherwise, is irrelevant. That includes men and women, trans or otherwise, but it can also include intersex people (who are not distinctly male or female or have physical traits of both sexes). 

So while, yes, bisexual probably should encompass trans individuals, I know there are some bisexual people who wouldn’t be comfortable with that, and others who’d agree that was fair and right. 

But that doesn’t make pan unnecessary or redundant. Do we need more bi-acceptance? Yes. But Pan is, as far as I’m concerned, it’s own individual thing that can and should exist on its own merits, not as a way to lessen bi acceptance. 

(via asongstress)

videohall:

Dog doesn’t want kisses

> This dog has incredible comedic timing.

> Remember your place, human.

vickumss:

"In Tokyo" made me think of that soft grunge pastel goth scene so I figured Cherry could use another outfit uvu

vickumss:

"In Tokyo" made me think of that soft grunge pastel goth scene so I figured Cherry could use another outfit uvu

topleldistant:

Beautiful ;-;

Senpai!!!

topleldistant:

Beautiful ;-;

Senpai!!!

northfalls:

natalie dormer | GQ magazine, april 2014

shes so gorgeous *A*